Find a Lawyer

FAIZ MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307/341/147/148/149 of the Islamic Criminal Law Enforcement Act (IX of 1974), Section 5 / 15 The cancellation of bail was filed by two anti-FIR money related to two copies of the same incident which were found to be valid during the investigation and it was chalked out to both parties that the members of both parties were injured in their FIR. The accused has not yet been reported for suppressing the injuries. It should be noted that in the investigation of which party collected the material during the investigation, the Shariah Court and the District Criminal Court did not support the reconciliation of the accused's version in granting the bail to the accused. Was wrong and illogical, nor was any law violation allowed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 1995

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABAD 1995 MLD 1343
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. SUMANDAR KHAN 1995 MLD 1350
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J&K THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY v. MAJ.?GEN. (RTD.) MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN, MEMBER LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR 1995 MLD 1361
• JAVED IQBAL KHAWAJA v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 1995 CLC 1362
• PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. KALYAL KASHMIR TANNERIES LIMITED 1995 CLC 1483
• MUHAMMAD MEHRBAN v. SARUD DIN 1995 CLC 1541
• MUHAMMAD DIN v. NUSRAT BEGUM 1995 CLC 1558
• SHAUKAT ALI v. LIAQAT ALI 1995 CLC 1566

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 1995 →

lawer from fb area from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes