NASEEM HASSAN, CIVIL JUDGE, FIRST CLASS, LAHORE versus LAHORE HIGH COURT
The countersigning officer also repeated in the annual intelligence report against the Section 5 Judicial Officer, claiming in regard to fitness and welfare, that even an average officer of a judicial officer could not be considered to the contrary. The concerned Judicial Officer was not to be informed in the same way as he was not obliged to take publicity at the time of the recording of the annual secret report, and his estimation as an average officer made him equal among many.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
