KHUSHNOOD HUSSAIN versus CHIEF SECRETARY, CHAIRMAN, PROVINCIAL BOARD OF MANAGEMENT BENEVOLENT FUND, LAHORE
The grant of the Benefit Fund from the Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Section 20 Punjab Government Servants Benevolent Fund Ordinance (XIV of 1960), Sections 4 and 6 Benevolent Funds covers a significant period or term of service such as Section 20 is clearly provided in the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, and denying such a grant would be a violation of the terms and conditions of service of a public servant. Maxim UB Just IB Redeem is the principle of law that will enable a public servant to come into service. The Tribunal Board of Management, cannot be called a private institution because the Government is a private one distinguished by the Government from the departmental authority for the purpose of utilizing the funds under the rules and regulations under section 6 of the Punjab Government Servants Benevolent Fund Ordinance, 1960. Can't be called an institution. The board's role clearly suggested that it was a departmental authority that was responsible for the management of the fund so it was clearly subject to the incident. In the proceedings under the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, it was held that the Board of Legal Employment refuses to give any benefit to the public servant, the department was not authority as per section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974. Was considered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
