Find a Lawyer

JAM MANZOOR AHMAD versus DIRECTOR (FOOD), PUNJAB, LAHORE

7 and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Inquiry Penalty Disciplinary Action against a Government Employee Neither the statements of witnesses were recorded in the evidence of the allegation, nor were the public servants given any opportunity to present evidence in defense, Instead, as it was heard orally by the inquiry officer, the inquiry officer did not decide whether the civil servant violated any order, under R4, under the Punjab Civil Servant (FCT and Discipline) Rules. 1975 and the Authority has directed the inquiry officer, the competent officer and the advance of the Authority to recover a number of inquiries. I know that it's not responsible for the civil servant wheat shortage was due to natural causes outside its control. The three responsible officials were searched and they made their decisions based on alternatives and speculations. The Supreme Court accepted the civil appeal. The servant placed aside the order of the service tribunal and obtained the remand of the case for the appointment of an inquiry officer by the inquiry officer in accordance with the law and observations made by the Supreme Court in the case of Mukhtar Ahmed Bhatti, 1992 SCMR. According to 1864 famous high court advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer