Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAZEEL versus KHAIR-UN-NISA

Articles 3, 8 and 9 of the Dowry and Bridal Gifts (Prohibition) Act, 1976, Pakistan 1973, Article 185 (3) for the recovery of dowry articles were issued by the trial court in favor of the bride, the High Court. Was upheld until the violation of the validity of the. Sections 3, 8 and 9, the provisions of the Dowry and Groom's Gift (Prohibition) Act 1976, for the first time emphasized the support of a leave application for appeal to the Supreme Court. Was not brought before the court. For the first time his wife was raised to deprive him of his property. Within a reasonable time to deprive the wife of her property and the husband did not object to the wife's departure while her dowry articles were taking her home. With regard to the evaluation of these articles or the violation of section 3 of the Dowry and Bride (Prohibition) Act 1976, they will no longer be entitled to claim that they should not be allowed to withdraw or receive their trial. Should. Such a request was being dishonest in violation of Section 3 of the e-Act, therefore it cannot be protected so the list of dowry articles will not be admissible in the evidence merely because its copy was not submitted to the Registrar of Marriages. Which was not guaranteed to interfere. The fact findings listed by the courts below were denied on the grounds that the husband had appealed the appeal. best advocate from Jehlum lawyer