Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus AJAZ DIN

Para 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Joint Allotment Against Joint Vigilance Asylum Asylum in which the Applicant and the Respondent (two brothers) are in question, The Provisional Allotment in the Name of the Respondent, however, remains intact. About which he was in special possession while the applicant's temporary allotment (related to the Guzara allowance) was also included in the joint allotment in the post-consolidation proceedings, however, on the land that was in favor of the applicant and the respondent. Was jointly allotted, stability was on the scheme The scheme was allotted in the name of the applicant only while the defendant Ali The name of the respondent was omitted by such respondent and his name was added as an allotment in the postconsolidation scheme was a constitutional petition against the inclusion of the respondents 'question regarding the allotment of land in the applicants' questions. The claim that the applicant and the defendant were jointly invalid was dismissed, instead the allotment could only be made to them, and the respondent's name to be omitted due to a clearance error, the authority to make the amendment settlement authority. Was in his favor and the High Court came to the conclusion that the authority's order was passed According to Noon was strict, the names of the applicants and the respondents for the claim were shared and instead the allotment could not be made in the name of the applicant legally, the leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Balakot lawyer