Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE


Sections 302,307, 326, 201, 148/149 and 109 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicant, who was charged with criminal offenses, on behalf of the complainant The plea was found to be innocent by virtue of being summoned. It was approved by the trial court and proceedings were issued against it, against which the petitioner ordered a review saying that the petitioner's argument regarding the correctness of the High Court was that once the inquiry was finished, Subsequently, no new trial proceedings could be issued against them, no provision of litigation was guaranteed that the order of removal was an administrative order and not a judicial order, therefore, In the first round, he was not eligible for review. In the earlier proceedings the deadline was reached for the applicant who did not take further action to appeal against the same leave, which was denied in those circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Khurian wala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.