S.D.O. (E) WAPDA versus HIDAYATULLAH
Section 24 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Dismantling the electricity supply of residential homes for consumers who paid residential connection charges but defaulted to pay for their industrial premises (consumer) damages An order to pay Rs. 10,000 as damages to the appellate court and the trial court, however, in any case reaching the extent of the claim by the plaintiff (the consumer) appellate court for such damages. Has not been prosecuted for illegal or material misconduct. The decision, which would not justify interfering with the High Court's review jurisdiction, directed the High Court to identify the names, current positions and postings of the officers who were the plaintiffs and their families. Are responsible for illegally cutting electricity and recovering money. To personally remove them in proportion to their liability
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Fateh Jang lawyer