MUMTAZ ALI versus CHAIRMAN, N; W.F.P. LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PESHAWAR
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2SA, 35 (5) (d) and 1 (3) (a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), section 1 (4) (a), 2 (b) (f) (1) and section O12 (3) of the grievance application, regardless of the nature of the employee's complaint, whether referred to in section 25A (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance is defined in Section O12 (3) of 1968, the ability of the Labor Court to deal with it, Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, Section O12 of 1969 (1969). 3) forthcoming) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968, especially after providing that the employee was removed from the job in violation of the provisions of the Standing Order. Can be reviewed by requesting a complaint. Unless otherwise stated, Article 35 (5) (d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, it was a common practice of the Labor Court to exercise and exercise such other powers as may be imposed by the Labor Court or It could have been given or handed over. The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, recording its decision on the complaint filed under section O12 (3) of 1968, will not function as a personal post.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
