Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFSAR versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

Section 12 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 129, Illusions (G) Pre-Impression Suit During the approval of a pre-emption suit under third party, defining your claim regarding the property, against the defendant (s). In the separate case, the fact that he had purchased such land and the defendant did not give his consent statement after which the consent of the third party in favor of the third party by the plaintiff (former importer) after finding such decree. Was run and sued the third party. He also challenged the consent decree in his preliminary suit and in which he was not made the most important and star witness to the quantum of proof defense of the party, which he claimed when he was a defendant as a witness. I appeared, refusing to state the oath regarding the transaction in question, such fact was not enough to merely disperse the defendant's case and to raise any doubt that he was being defended by them. Is protected by the right to exercise legal rights. Aintiff was a liar and based on the evidence of the plaintiff's rights, the right to self-determination was established, in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Hassan Abdal lawyer