SANDOZ (PAKISTAN) LTD. DADU versus MUHAMMAD USMAN RAJAR
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) (b) dismissed from service employee corruption, he was dismissed after allegations of charge sheet and domestic inquiry against him. Reclaimed claim Respecting the Madison bill, the payment he already received, the evidence on the record has been fully proven that the employee misbehaved by prioritizing false claims and demanding double payment of the Madison bill. He already had the compensation Act of the employee was dishonest. As a result of which the employee lost the trust of the employer who was a foreign company employee, he was dismissed from the job because of a morally reprehensible job.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer
