Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SULTAN AHMED versus GHULAM RAZA


The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 379/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) failed to prove the motive against the accused in appeal, the presence of eyewitnesses at the relevant time was suspicious. The witnesses are interested and hostile, and they were denied by the trial court's four accomplices, their testimony requiring solidarity, which lacked evidence to recover, was unreliable, and medical evidence provided an ocular version. All such things were denied by the High Court. Record of evidence and proper and proper reasons for investigation and release of offenders Appealing against acquittal while adhering to the principles of safe administration of criminal justice were dismissed in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Dhoun Kal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.