Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (a) and 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Possession of intoxicants, denial of narcotic in various packets / parcels before being shipped The indictment against the accused for chemical analysis was that he booked cartons for the cargo, and was told that 945 grams of heroin was recovered from the cartons from 26 lifts and 420 grams of heroin was recovered from the other 10 lifts. In the KG cases it was reported that the whole heroin was recovered from the 26 lifts recovered and only 10 grams were sent for chemical analysis. The heroin recovered from the other 10 lifts was also mixed together and only 10 grams was sent for chemical analysis. In such cases, the total heroin that was sent and tested by a chemical inspector could only reach 78 grams of 34 grams and could only be punished for the heroin offense in which the lawsuit laid down. The sight was sent for analysis and tested. In this case, the offense against Amir Zeeb v. State (PLD 2012 SC 380), falls under the purview of Section 9 (A) and not of the control of Section 9 (C) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997. Regarding the permissible decision referred to by the accused i.e. Amir Zeb v Estate (PLD 2012 SC). 380) was a criminal appeal, in which in the present case all the evidence was presented for trial and it would not yet be possible to allege that the prosecution would present evidence only to the extent of weight. He referenced that in the present case, the prosecution was free to direct further evidence and the court requested that the accused be referred for chemical analysis.
