Find a Lawyer

KALA versus MST. KAMO BEGUM

Section Re Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, Paras AA (ix) and Jammu Kashmir Jammu and Kashmir allotment of land for evacuation of migrants will not be excluded from such land compensation pool allotted to the migrant, and the Rehabilitation / Rehabilitation Department allotted to it. Could not Someone else behind this alot

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• NADEEM ASHRAF v. State 2013 SCMR 1538
• SAHIB JAN v. Mst. AYESHA BIBI 2013 SCMR 1540
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Communication and Works Department v. AHMAD HUSSAIN 2013 SCMR 1547
• SABIR HUSSAIN alias SABRI v. State 2013 SCMR 1554
• ANWAR TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED 2013 SCMR 1570
• LANVIN TRADERS, KARACHI v. PRESIDING OFFICER, BANKING COURT NO.2, KARACHI 2013 CLD 1581
• DILAWAR HUSSAIN v. State 2013 SCMR 1582
• Haji MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN v. MEMBER BOR PUNJAB, LAHORE 2013 SCMR 1595

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

pakistani advocates Neelam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes