DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, PESHAWAR DIVISION, PESHAWAR versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, section 37 and 38 (3A), instead of filing an appeal against the Labor Court's decision within 30 days before the appellant tribunal provided under Article 37 of the Ordinance, About 7 months after the verdict was filed. The Labor Court claimed that because the appeal was time-bound by the treatment of the appellant, he was forced to file a review request, the employer did not allege that the Labor Court's decision was jurisdictional. Has suffered a setback or a rule flaw which was only due to progress. To maintain the revision was that the appeal, which was an alternative remedy, was terminated over time because it was insufficient to justify the revocation of the revision request because it was in default of itself. Equivalent to paying a premium to employer / applicant for.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
