SAKHI DOST JAN versus P.N.C.B
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 350 Special Trials for Speedy Trials Ordinance (XXII of 1991), Sections 5, 6 and 7 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3, 4 and 26 Was invoiced as While the cases were pending when the sessions were transferred to the special court for trial trial evidence before the federal government court, it was concluded by the special court and the matter was settled for argument when the federal government. Had moved all matters back. On the return of the cases, the court requested the Sessions Court to have a trial of nine, in which the special court had no jurisdiction to record the evidence and because of this action, non-judicial proceedings took place. Gone. The Special Court for Speed Trials did not suffer from any legal impairment or lack of jurisdiction as the trial court moved to have the discretion to proceed on the matter. Existing record witnesses were thoroughly examined before the special court, no evidence of any prejudice was shown by the accused, which led to the case being filed under the Special Court of Speedy Trials.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Feroz Watan lawyer