Find a Lawyer

UNITED BANK LTD. versus MUHAMMAD RAHIM KHAN

Failure to present evidence on Civil Procedure Code Order XVIIA XVII, R 3 successive dates of CPC habits gives the court six opportunities for the defendant to present evidence but defendant fails to present evidence The order of the court was appropriate to the extent of closure of the evidence, where either party failed to comply with the necessary instructions which impeded the proceeding of the case; the court was soon authorized to decide the case, however. ,, On the failure of the defendant in the trial court, the court seized the opportunity to default to the party for its investigation. Should work. Although there were full powers to present the evidence to proceed and decide the case immediately, the court could not refuse to ignore the material on record and issue orders in the dark, with some evidence already in place. Are still on the record, even after the defendant's evidence was exhausted, the trial court was required to apply in mind with regard to the materially available material and a specific re-evaluation was granted. Order will not automatically be issued with blanket authority to defend against me; IDE was the first to disregard the Court's order, advocates from Astore lawyer