AHMAD JAN versus DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
The trial court decided both the details of the nature of the sentence by Art West Pakistan Arms Ordinance XX of 1965 (Section 13E Criminal Code V 1898), Sections 397 and 561A _ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199. Was. In that case, the declaration of punishment or punishment was initiated automatically in this case, and in the other case the sentence contained in section 397 will be followed, therefore, the PC will be applicable, Therefore, there is no compelling reason. In addition to exercising the inherent jurisdiction in this case, in the absence of any patent being invalid, in the event of a clear violation of law or breach of duty, interference with constitutional jurisdiction is also not guaranteed. Was, under which the application was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Lalamusa lawyer
