Under the civil litigation code 42 (1908), section 96 96 and OVII, R 11 suit, the trial court that dismissed the first defendant was dismissed by a civil judge, But the appeal was rejected by the district judge. Because of the agreement between them, there is no legal law in the plaintiffs' CPC which rejects such a settlement decision not to enforce its ownership rights in the disputed land. Allows the District Judge to challenge the decision / decision (subordinate court), which was unable to set aside the same plaintiff for non-compliance with such decree, under this section. Like the bar contained in (96 ()), an appeal can be filed against the party, but the CPC is active in the decree against any party, but not against any person There is. As a plaintiff in which the plaintiff treats appeals and revisions against such order, a civil judge (subordinate court) cannot challenge the plaintiff in the plaintiff. The lawsuit was dismissed under circumstances pending a stay and non-retention
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
