Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUKHTAR AHMED versus STATE


Article 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (2) (a) Investigating the evidence, the High Court did not say whether the theory taken by the trial court was not possible or the reasons for its finding. Was given by her. Artificial observations were made by the High Court regarding the acquittal as a free and true testimony of the eyewitness and the participation of the accused in this case was based on evidence and false speculation, depending on the deceased's declaration of death. Was not done For reasonable reasons, the trial court's view was supported by the evidence, and it was reasonably possible that the recorded sentence and sentence against the accused were dropped by the High Court and accordingly they were acquitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Dijkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.