Section 38 (2) Punjab Municipal Works Rules, 1925, R11 (2) Appellant discharged his duties as Municipal Engineer on his request Appellant claims that he was described as Municipal Engineer in the order of retirement. Gone, so that they can be treated. The supervisor was not valid at the time of his retirement. Appellant was appointed municipal engineer for a term of one year, and he was subsequently held under a restraining order by the appellant's retirement order of the courts. After retiring as a municipal engineer, it was merely referenced that he was serving as a municipal engineer at the time of retirement, which he was retiring from, depending on his retirement via appellant. He was challenged in the lawsuit, but his plea for temporary injunction was denied, and he decided to withdraw the case. Such fact shows that the appellant himself Did not accept his retirement order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
