Find a Lawyer

MST. ATTIQA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ KHAN

Section 11 raises the question of ownership and ownership of suit land in a subsequent suit after the first round of litigation between the parties to the judiciary. If I don't decide, it can be picked up later, otherwise it may not be reopened by any party.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• NAZAR KHAN v. Mst. HASSAN BEGUM 2013 MLD 913
• FINANCE DEPARTMENT through Secretary v. TARIQ ZIA ABBASI 2013 PLC(CS) 918
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI 2013 PLC(CS) 934
• AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR v. Sahibzada Raja MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN 2013 YLR 969
• NASIR KALEEM v. JUNAID 2013 PCrLJ 987
• Mst. SARDAR BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD ILYAS 2013 CLC 1013
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. GHAZANFAR alias KALA 2013 YLR 1020
• AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary v. Raja HABIBULLAH KHAN 2013 PLC(CS) 1031

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

us immigration advocates from Swat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes