Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

The R17 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Congo Services Rules, 1979, 4 5, 5 and 6 publicity public servants working as Patwari were promoted as directors against the quota post on the direction of the Prime Minister. After about one month of such development, the Prime Minister withdrew his order to publicize and instead directed that the co-government employee be appointed Gurdwara and directed the Prime Minister by the relevant authority. Compliance was made and the order of the employees was challenged by a reversal order which clearly violated the publicity of public servants. Rules on the subject since it was not made on the basis of examination or examination by the appropriate committee or board, if such advertising were later canceled, public servants had no right to refer to any court law where To be judged purely ged according to the provisions of the matters. Although the authority canceled, the order by the public servant to cancel the development could not be challenged by the public servant, D's employment had to remain within less than two months while the public servant had to stay for two years. Had to remain on probation and before the expiry of probationary period the order to cancel the development could be passed by an authorized authority not to be a grieving person of the public servant, could not challenge the order to be canceled. Its development immigration advocates email from Barkhan lawyer