versus
Section 4 (a) Appeal filed before the Tribunal Maintenance was objected to by the administration on the grounds that it was not admissible as the evidence was completely before the department filed its appeal. It was proved that the appeal was filed by the public servants 13 days after the appeal was filed by the public servants before the tribunal while in accordance with section 4 (a) of the Act, no appeal would lie to the tribunal unless the deposed public servant department. Would not have preferred the appeal to him and the same day would have passed for ninety days. A government employee who filed a court appeal said that if an appeal had been filed before the Tribunal before the expiry of the ninth day, and an appeal for a preliminary hearing had been reached before the Tribunal after the expiry of the ninth day, So it was sensible, it was repelled with a view. The fact is that the issue of limitation and retention was still remarkable till the date on which the case or appeal was set up and the date on which the preliminary hearing was set up was only before the tribunal was able to hear the appeal for a period of ninety days. After the Court of Appeal was filed before it was filed when a law was granted by a Tribunal of Limited Jurisdiction and the legal origin, terms and qualifications must be attached to it must be strictly enforced. It was not proper to maintain the appeal before the Tribunal and was liable to dismiss on that basis. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chak Jhumra lawyer