NOOR MUHAMMAD versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
The appointment of four and five servicemen as government employee, which was initially made on a temporary basis by the Selection Committee, was later revoked by the order of the District Education Officer. Challenged the appointment / Appeal to the Secretary Education to confirm the Government employee on the basis that the Government employee was not provided with the Opposition despite receiving the first position in the interview while the Government employee who was interviewed No. 13 Was deployed and executed a hat request (Yesterday was done in the Secretariat) Deputy Secretary, Education submitted its note to the Parliamentary Secretary Education who recommended these notes and forwarded their recommendation to the Minister of Education who, after approval of the appointment of a Government employee through notification. Appointed as a civil servant. In favor of an authorized civil servant, the appeal can only be challenged by a person who was a public servant and whose terms and conditions of service were affected by the opposing brother who was neither a civil servant nor a civil servant. Its terms and conditions of service. Affected, he was not authorized to file or appeal an appeal on behalf of his brother, who did not challenge the appointment of a civil servant himself. Only the appeal against the order of the competent authority was authorized before the appellate authority. Was the next authority authorized by the authority. The order for the appointment of a public servant was approved by the District Education Officer and thereafter the authority or appellate authority was the divisional director and not the secretary.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
