Find a Lawyer

KABIR HUSSAIN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 22 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act 1975, Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VI, R 1 petitions must deal effectively with conflicts and vague denial requests and so on. Should be answered. The government and the respondents (government employees) did not explicitly deny, claiming that the public servant had no government employee at the time of regulating the appointment of a public servant, and his such ridiculous and ambiguous answer to the facts. Confession. The respondent in the memorandum of appeal was like this, not the civil servant when the order of the question was passed by notification, the ad hoc appointment of the respondents was to be regularized, therefore, the information was illegal, false and without effect. The breach was passed under the section 22 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Service Tribunal for the purpose for which the powers were given to the Government, however, G's view of the matter changed the order. Whereby the prior effect given to regularize respondent's ad hoc appointment was withdrawn. And his appointment shall be deemed appropriate from the date on which the defendant's ad hoc appointment was regular. jobs for fresh advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer