MUSAHIB KHAN JADOON versus WAPDA
Section 4 Promotion The public servant was not promoted despite the numbers exceeding the minimum threshold for development in posts B18 to B19, while the number of his juniors who were promoted was increased to twenty. There were more signs of at least third-degree promotion of junior-holding juniors than hold-senior seniors (scheduled for employment), in the absence of any policy / rules. To no avail, such an evaluation is workable and is not sustainable under any relevant policy / rule. The relevant authority of the department was instructed to reconsider public servants' publicity within a stipulated time and if there was no evil in the ACR and its score was higher than sixty (B19). The minimum threshold for development in the post is fixed) With the approval of development and consideration by the Authority, the department's promotion committee will be delayed, and its sanity will be restored with fruitful measures. T
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer
