Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL NASEEM versus CHAIRMAN, CBR, ISLAMABAD

After the approval of the departmental appeal of the public servants by changing the section 4 service tribunal to mandatory retirement sentence, the competent authority had appointed the service dismissal order which was in fact the notice of the service tribunal service tribunal. Did not come At that time the illicit account of the facts received was dealt with by the appellant on the merits and it was decided in accordance with the law that if such information was brought to the notice of the service tribunal, the appeal would become a disqualified authority. Dealt with The notification for the restoration of public servants was issued following the approval of the department's appeal, however, in the wake of the service tribunal's order dismissing the dismissal sentence, the order for dismissal from the job was withdrawn, effective Remedy Qualification. The authority was not legally obliged to retract the initial notification. The civil defense restoration departmental appellate authority was within its jurisdiction to decide the appeal of the department regardless of the tribunal's decision. The Service Rules of Disciplinary Law and other relevant laws provide the legal authority with the legal infrastructure for the decision of the Court of Appeals and this was not a structure. Under the Service Tribunal Act 1973 or in any other law severely affected by the powers of the competent authority, the rehabilitation of a public servant may be on appeal of his department, irrespective of the decision of his service tribunal. The appeal was submitted due to a lack of acceptance information law firms from Babri Banda lawyer