Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID MIRZA versus CHAIRMAN, WAPDA

Rr 5 & 6 [as amended in 1983] Promotion Employees who were merely diploma holders claimed that prior to the 1983 amendment, they were promoted to senior engineers on the basis of low fitness on the senior quota for specific quotas. To be considered. The West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (Water Wing) Service of Engineers Rules, 1968 Rolls, the amendment in 1983 through the competent authority meant that diploma holders were not eligible for development as Engineers Senior Engineers (B 18). ? The key consideration before the competent authority for disqualifying diploma holders for promotion to the post of Senior Engineer (B18) was that it involved the performance of professional engineering work, by senior engineer performers. The nature of the duties requires a professional engineering. In another decision, the expertise that was not available to non-degree holders also confirmed the notion that no diploma holder could be appointed to a position that included the rules for professional engineering work modification. Employees who were disqualified for the required development could not be granted any relief, the employees were found to be ineligible for proper development because the appeals of the senior engineers of the employees were left out of time restriction. , Under the circumstances inheritance advocates near Piaro goth lawyer