GUL HASAN versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE
Section App Appellate Qualification On the basis of mandatory retirement from employment on the basis of misappropriation of public funds, the employee was not a public servant and was not eligible for service tribunal jurisdiction as a station master. His appeal was ineligible when disciplinary proceedings took place. The employee was initiated against and was given a mandatory retirement sentence, although the employee, being a station master, was not a government employee approving the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, but under a notification issued by the Ministry of Railways, the station. Some types of railway employees, including masters, were included. The employee designated as a "caretaker", the employee in the caretaker category, was a civil servant and was able to appeal in the light of this situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hunza Nagar lawyer
