ANSAR AHMAD versus PROVINCE OF SINDH
Negative Remarks in ACR by Countersuiting Officer This counter counting officer did not comment on the points raised by the appellant; he did not succeed in verifying the claims and disputes of the public servant, therefore, There was no official employee's charge against him. There was no justification for giving remarks to the Countessing Officer of Madness when he was not yet able to promote when he had not agreed with the second rating made by the Reporting Officer, the countersigning office prevented the employee from developing. There was no relevant or relevant reason for this, which led to the countersigning officer's conduct being severely defeated. This bias and misuse of the right brain and purpose cannot be interpreted as meaning that the ACR was directed to dismiss negative comments.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mir Ali lawyer