ISHTIAQ AHMED versus MEMBER, FINANCE, RAILWAY BOARD, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Service Tribunal Appeal for withdrawal of advance increments without notice to the extent disclosed in the record documents reveals that the department is continuing to pay the increment till the end of February 1990 and so on. Was also a force in the conflict. The applicant, who issued an order dated 25th 1989, through which the government employee withdrew the advance increment, was never contacted. The government employee received the order under question in April 1990. What, when his advance was first barred, he preferred the appeal against it was granted to the service tribunal which allowed the appeal to be granted at the time of the ban. I was considering the limit question
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Thatta lawyer