ISRAR ALI CHISHTI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Article 212 (3) Public Promotion Employer (Applicant) had not taken any action before the Service Tribunal to challenge the statement of fact charged by the Government in which the service was assigned by the Tribunal. No error or legal error was found for the reasons given. Rejecting the government employee's appeal, the public servant himself opted for a certain position and refused to accept promotion to the department for 14 months, in which case his next junior was promoted and seniority promotion. Was to be given and since the other employees were senior, they were promoted on the basis of seniority in the cadre before the claim of the public servant (the applicant), thus the department rightly called it. Was rejected and no exception can be taken to dismiss the appeal of their services before the tribunal. The application for leave of appeal against the development of other employees was dismissed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer
