TANVIR IQBAL SIDDIQI versus PRINCIPAL, OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS FOUNDATION (OPF), GIRLS COLLEGE, ISLAMABAD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 (3) petitioner's services terminated The petitioner challenged the order to terminate his services through a constitutional petition which was rejected by the respondents by the High Court, although an independent body. But it was not formed. Any law, and therefore, the High Court, lacked jurisdiction to intervene in the matter. The correct respondent did not decide that it was a federal government department and was not performing the duties of the Federation in relation to the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution High Court. Therefore, it was rightly concluded that the constitutional petition was not authorized, there was no indication that it could interfere with the order of the High Court in dismissing the constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer
