FAROOQ SADIQ (MISS) versus SECRETARY, HEALTH
R, 3 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Section 14 of the BP as Nursing Instructor Appointment Promotion Sanitary Government employee's initial appointment on 23 12 1982 was invalid because such appointment. It was edited before. The scales on 26 12 1981 and consequently the nursing instructors in BP section 14 were placed in BP section 17 and the existing nursing instructors were promoted. The day on which the Government employee was appointed nor the person appointed was present in the post-BP section 17 of the Nursing Instructors for which the Public Service Commission had failed all the forums with the approval of the Government employees. Appointments could be made. Adjusting to his complaint, adjustments were made to continue the service as the nurse in charge (BP section 14), which was the only post on the appeal of a public servant. Against such an offer and contrary to BP's refusal to deny its development in section 17, promotion of validity was required in BP section 17 which required three years of service in BP section 16 which Employee development gets in the way and no other alternative was available Offer to retain a public employee in BP Section 44 If a Government employee has been in BP's Section 14 service for about 11 years If they were asked to start a new education in the same grade as the nurse in charge, they would suffer from seniority and monetary gains, so as not to make a mistake. Oops. On behalf of him but by the relevant authority, who appointed him as Nursing Instructor in BP Section 14 when there was no such post in this grade
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Jampur lawyer