NASREEN BIBI versus ATTA MUHAMMAD
Section 5 and Schedule: Evidence relating to the settlement of the marriage due to the Khulah plaintiff stated that the marriage of the defendant's brother was proposed, but on the day of the marriage, the plaintiff was brought as a bride and the defendant. Ali lived together at intervals for a total of three years and he often quarreled. Such claims were not challenged by the plaintiff and he proved on record that he was the defendant. Hatred and she cannot go with him on any condition whatever is on the record. Suffice it to say that the spouses were separated several times and could not walk together and had been living for the last four years. From the facts, it has been recorded in the record that despite the presence of the son and the possible negative effects. The dispute between the parties was undeniable. The plaintiff's brother's marriage to the plaintiff's sister, the plaintiff had adopted for the claim of breaking the marriage. Such facts are suppressed. The plaintiff has claimed hatred against her husband and has dissolved the marriage on the land of Khulla. Is entitled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Mehmood Kot lawyer