GHULAM RASOOL versus MOONDAN
A IX, R 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Placing the former order separately was not personally presented to the defendants which record shows that the defendants had served the summons. The address for was not valid. It may be served by alternate mode. Therefore, the publication was not justified in the press so that no material was recorded to suggest that the publication of the notice in the press never reached the defendant or he was ever aware of it, under oath, on speculation In the case of a plain refusal of service by the defendants to the plaintiff. Proper service was effectively terminated by publication of the notice in the press, so to allow the courts a fair chance of defense in the lawsuit filed against them, to dismiss the previous partial judgment and injunction against the defendants. I was justified. It was also legal, which promoted the cause of justice and promoted its cause.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Domeli lawyer