Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIB versus JANAT BIBI

West Pakistan Reconciliation Courts Ordinance 3, 5 and 6 of the Ordinance 1961 Receipt of money against the applicant / alleged lender under the Ordinance, 1961, before the Council of Jurisdiction for recovery of the amount of Schedule Part I suit. In which the appellant allegedly borrowed from the respondent / lender. , But no document was filed to support the claim. Appellant denied respondents' claim, claiming that the Court of Reconciliation had the jurisdiction to issue a claim for a claim of money established under Ordinance XLIV of 1961, provided that the agreement, invoice, or other Based on the document and the respondent. The Consultation Court had failed to produce any documentary evidence to establish its claim, its claim should have been dismissed; the respondent submitted a document to support the issue of debt enhancement under this question. Failure to do so, the reconciliation court in this case should proceed with the jurisdiction and claim the alleged lender has been absolutely rejected [jurisdiction] when you need a advocate from Mailsi lawyer