MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD DIN
Section 4 and 8 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, the sale of the land in dispute in the area of pre-Haqqani Haqqani colony was made by a decree between the shopkeeper and seller at the time when the sale of any land in that colony area. Notification of ban on premature capture was reported in connection with. Was operative, but the notification was withdrawn before the controversial sale of the land was approved, said the pre-emptor, since the mutation was approved after the return of the notification, saying the notification had been banned in this case before. There was no power. In the case of a pre-discrimination claim, the plaintiff had to prove that he had a right to the date of the sale, the date of the trial and the date of the court-ordered injunction when the notification was at the time the land in dispute. The sales operators, pre-emptor, had no pre-literacy rights because the notice was previously exempted from vacancy.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer