Representing the Public Act 1976, the admissibility of the nomination papers of the 14 candidates was challenged by the competing candidate on the basis that the candidate was a bank loan defaulter whose amount is more than 1 million which the candidate borrowed from the bank. Some amount had been paid before the rival candidate had claimed against him the amount of less than Rs 1 lakh left over, claiming that the candidate was unwilling to pay the loan from other banks / finance institutions, but such objection The competing candidate did not appear before the Returning Officer. When a candidate is against interference, the rival candidate's appeal is dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
