Find a Lawyer

UMAN HAYAT LALIKA versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD GONDAL

Representing the Public Act 1976, the admissibility of the nomination papers of the 14 candidates was challenged by the competing candidate on the basis that the candidate was a bank loan defaulter whose amount is more than 1 million which the candidate borrowed from the bank. Some amount had been paid before the rival candidate had claimed against him the amount of less than Rs 1 lakh left over, claiming that the candidate was unwilling to pay the loan from other banks / finance institutions, but such objection The competing candidate did not appear before the Returning Officer. When a candidate is against interference, the rival candidate's appeal is dismissed law firms from Guddu lawyer