Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

The Land Disposal (Land Settlement) Act, 1958 by the claimant of the cancellation of the land was confirmed by the claimant to the land left in India at that time and instead the dispute was allotted to the claimant. Was gone and canceled. The remand for inquiry was obtained if, in fact, the claimant had migrated from India to India, on the basis of compelling evidence, the Additional Settlement Commissioner, with the powers of the Chief Settlement Commissioner, decided that the claimant. There was no fraudulent person as the claimant is the party. The claim was genuine. The order passed with the authority of the Chief Settlement Commissioner was challenged before the Additional Settlement Commissioner, who decided that after hearing the parties, the decision was based on documentary evidence based on the evidence of the Chief Settlement Commissioner. The order made cannot be challenged before the Additional Settlement Commissioner no. Justification is Foun The order directing such investigation by the Additional Settlement Commissioner to investigate the claimant's entitlement was illegal law firms from Sohawa District Daska lawyer