Find a Lawyer

HAJI AYOOB versus THE STATE

The offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) reviewing the evidence could not establish Alibi's defense request, the delay in filing the FIR did not matter because the incident occurred during the day. And there was no question. The lack of evidence of the presence of semen in the vagina to identify a false case or the victim of a false document was unnecessary because the actual penetration by the medical admissions proved to be sufficient to prove Zainabal's guilt. Non-recording of the victim's statement Under section 161, the CCP did not cause any prejudice by the investigating officer. The victim's mere statement was sufficient to return the accused to the crime and the accused's sentence was kept under conditions. Was. when you need a advocate from Guddu lawyer