JAMIL versus THE STATE
Definition of evidence of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392, 342 and 411. The judicial confessions given by the accused played an active role in the commission of the crime for each of them, therefore, neither excuse nor coercion was obtained. Or in the presence of extremely powerful circumstances against the accused in the presence of coercive procedures, any contradiction in the ocular testimony can be justified. The complainant had pursued the accused, describing the incident to the police party and also filed a regular FIR, before any investigations were not carried out. And the accused was convicted by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kashmir lawyer