Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD MEHMOOD

Section 395/149 Crimes against Property En (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 20 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 103 evidence defining delay in recording confessional statements of accused Found to be found guilty of being considered illegal and unsecured The recovery of stolen currency notes from the accused was in violation of Section 103, CRPC's mandatory provisions and was identified based on hearing evidence. Who had stolen his identity value. Therefore, the case against the accused failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt, the accused acquitted in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Taxila lawyer