Find a Lawyer

HAMIDAN BEGUM versus ABDUL RIAZ

Article 13 Ordinance of Muslim Family Laws (VIII of 1961), the wife of the abolition of marriage 7 had acquired the land from the husband's father at the time of marriage, the wife had set up a case for dissolution of the marriage on different grounds. Due to which the husband had failed. Providing rehabilitation for a period of two years; failed to perform his marital duties for three years and was treated with cruelty, and on the basis of kula maintenance maintenance, non-performance of marital obligations and oppression. Due to the barbarism, the marriage dispute will not be forced to return to this country. At the time of marriage, the wife received this question because the wife accepted the basis of the caliph other than the Family Court and the wife was entitled to dissolve the marriage, so it was unnecessary that the marriage be made the basis. And dissolve it. The order of the husband to return the tie land to the husband was made, under the circumstances, without any legal authority and declared to have no legal effect. patent advocate from Nilore lawyer