Find a Lawyer

KARIM BAKHSH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KHANEWAL

The Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, challenging the injunction on the plea of fraud, the deceased's widow demanded that as the only widow and child in her womb she was released. The defendant allegedly contracted with the competing defendants after the expulsion of the defendants, and on the basis of the alleged compromise, the court found the widow entitled to 1/4 of the deceased's widow, Shortly afterwards, the widow filed an application under section 12 (2), the CPC filed an application against the competing party for an alleged consent decision. And when this order is brought by force and unlawful influence, such application is dismissed on the ground that the application for unnecessary influence is not available under Section 12 (2), CPC: The widow later gave birth to a child and under section 12 (2), the CPC was filed by the minor's son through his grandmother and it was alleged that the earlier order of the agreement was trivial. What was left behind was a decree that, on the basis of the fraud and fraudulent plea, it was resisted that the present applicant was free of the earlier proceedings under Section 12 (2), CPC. As a result of Q not being able to make the same challenge in his plea as a result of the compromise decree, the term job in section 12, CPC was not required to be constrained. It is forbidden to point to only one decision maker or his successor, but this should be read to include any person, even though a party may declare the applicant minor as a tragic individual. famous supreme court advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer