Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SNDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATES (GTEED) LTD. versus PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN


The presence of semen inside the vagina of a child suffering from the value of evidence (section 3) and 10 (3) / 18 of the Adultery (1979) Ordinance 1979 does not prove that he was in fact sexually assaulted. Because there was nothing there was really positive evidence of the admission, however, he was found guilty of attempting to commit adultery affected by the adultery because he had on the occasion witnessed the arrival of witnesses committing actual adultery. Could not succeed. Consequently, section 10 (3) was read in section 10 (3) along with section 18 of the ordinance and was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Muridkay lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Explore

Platform

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms Privacy Policy Refund Policy Delivery Policy Made in Pakistan 🇵🇰