SNDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATES (GTEED) LTD. versus PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN
The presence of semen inside the vagina of a child suffering from the value of evidence (section 3) and 10 (3) / 18 of the Adultery (1979) Ordinance 1979 does not prove that he was in fact sexually assaulted. Because there was nothing there was really positive evidence of the admission, however, he was found guilty of attempting to commit adultery affected by the adultery because he had on the occasion witnessed the arrival of witnesses committing actual adultery. Could not succeed. Consequently, section 10 (3) was read in section 10 (3) along with section 18 of the ordinance and was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
