Section 302/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI 1979), the identification parade of the Section 20 evidence became very suspicious which occurred on a dark night and the suspect was not suspected to be eyewitnesses. ? They had correctly identified the accused and noted its specific features, especially when no features of the attackers were disclosed in the FIR, so the accused had no benefit in retrieving the rifle because the same accused. No shots were fired from him and he was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
