Sections 8 and 24 Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R10 ad hoc appointment was quite different from the regular ad hoc appointment made by promotion, which was quite different. As has been the case with regularity. By publicity, the regular reinforcement was made on the recommendation of the Department Promotion Committee, whereas in the case of initial recruitment, it was made on the recommendation of the Public Service Commission or the Department Selection Committee because the opposing employee was appointed as the Deputy Director. No progress was made, the question was not arising out of regularization of such development as the promotion of anti-employee was not considered by the Public Promotion Committee, hence the issue of regulating ad hoc promotion. The procedure was never implemented, so it is not in accordance with its regularity and development rules Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
