Find a Lawyer

ALI ZAIN-UL-ABADEEN versus CONTROLLING AUTHORITY AJ&K BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPUR

Article 44 Writing the Right Petition Differences in Urdu and English versions of academic institution questions. Re-examination of Examination Papers The rules for not allowing re-examination of papers were not marked by the applicant's resolved judicial response and was cross-examined by the inspector. The answer, which was partially validated by the Examiner, gave a zero number to the question that was not appropriate. Candidates should be allowed to double-check their answer books for this purpose. Yesterday was brought forward correctly, no part of any response was marked. There was no mistake on the back of the reply book and the answer book, the written request was accepted to meet the end of justice, and the chairman of the board of education was instructed to address the applicant's grievances. Let's consider this matter.

Related judgments — High Court Azad Kashmir, 2014

• ANWAR BEGUM v. COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, MANGLA DAM RAISING PROJECT, MIRPUR 2014 MLD 840
• Engr. AWAIS SAMAD v. AJ&K GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 846
• SAIF ALI KHAN v. KHAN MUHAMMAD KHAN 2014 CLC 874
• BAAZ v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 YLR 889
• SHAHEENA AKHTAR v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2014 PLC(CS) 912
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS v. UMAR HAYAT 2014 CLC 914
• Ch. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, AJK, BHIMBER 2014 CLD 948
• Prof. Dr. KHALID MAHMOOD v. AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad 2014 PLC(CS) 968

All High Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Dandot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes